1 |
Hi Martin, |
2 |
|
3 |
On 19-01-2021 07:58:00 +0100, Martin Oberzalek wrote: |
4 |
> > > gentoo prefix stack with |
5 |
> > > this upcomming new cygwin release (when its released) and give some feedback. If |
6 |
> > > I can get it working I would update |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Prefix/Cygwin[1] |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > I'm trying to understand what this means. I'm sure/certain the current |
11 |
> > tree doesn't work for Cygwin. This means I anticipate you'll have to |
12 |
> > patch/fix a lot of packages for it. Would it be more useful to use an |
13 |
> > overlay for Cygwin instead? |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I agree, maybe this would be a good solution. |
16 |
|
17 |
I'm looking for who would maintain Cygwin/Windows, and how. |
18 |
|
19 |
Currently there is a lot of remnants of Cygwin, but also decay. Python |
20 |
for instance got its Cygwin patches dropped (they didn't apply, and we |
21 |
had to move on for security and other reasons), hence I know for sure |
22 |
that Cygwin support is virtually non-existant in the current tree. |
23 |
|
24 |
I don't want to destroy the work of others, but at the current state, I |
25 |
cannot maintain Cygwin or Windows (nor do I have incentive to do so). |
26 |
With haubi retiring from the project, there's officially no Gentoo |
27 |
developers working on this. |
28 |
|
29 |
If a separate overlay or fork is the way to go, we can see if we can get |
30 |
such repo on Gentoo hardware and set it up, turn Cygwin into a proper |
31 |
sub-project or something, and move anything necessary there as not to |
32 |
hold back the Prefix migration of whatever's left back into the main |
33 |
gentoo repository. |
34 |
|
35 |
Thanks, |
36 |
Fabian |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
Fabian Groffen |
41 |
Gentoo on a different level |