| 1 |
On 07-11-2007 17:58:06 +0000, Marshall McMullen wrote: |
| 2 |
> Well it's not an issue for me anymore as I just exported the absolute |
| 3 |
> path to avoid having problems on my system. But I wanted to report it |
| 4 |
> anyhow in case you wanted to fix this in a more permanent way. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I tend to agree I like the idea of leaving in a location independent |
| 7 |
> system in case there is automounting, etc. So, maybe it's possible to |
| 8 |
> just fix the QA check or provide a means of dynamically resolving the |
| 9 |
> absolute path when you do the QA check rather than fixing the ebuild |
| 10 |
> itself ? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Not really. The thing is that I think it is /too/ ugly to install into |
| 13 |
the absolute path (and recognising it), while portage internally refers |
| 14 |
to the logical path. Then we better move the directory in the install |
| 15 |
image to the logical path before installing ;) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
But thanks for taking it on list. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 22 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list |
Archives