| 1 |
On 25-05-2007 13:30:38 -0500, Jason Pepas wrote: |
| 2 |
> Okay, so things are progressing along pretty nicely, and I have encountered |
| 3 |
> my first build problem: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> sparc-sun-solaris2.9-gcc -std=gnu99 -g -O2 |
| 6 |
> -L/var/local/cell/gentoo-prefix/lib -R/var/local/cell/gentoo-prefix/lib |
| 7 |
> -L/var/local/cell/gentoo-prefix/usr/lib |
| 8 |
> -R/var/local/cell/gentoo-prefix/usr/lib -Wl,--as-needed -o [ lbracket.o |
| 9 |
> ../lib/libcoreutils.a ../lib/libcoreutils.a -lgen -lsocket |
| 10 |
> /var/local/cell/gentoo-prefix/usr/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.1.2/crt1.o:(.plt+0x0): |
| 11 |
> multiple definition of `_PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_' |
| 12 |
> /usr/ccs/lib/libgen.so:(.plt+0x0): first defined here |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
What's your path? Where does the compiler come from? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Out of curiosity, did you ever try bootstrapping using |
| 17 |
bootstrap-prefix.sh? If so, did that get past point 1.3 of |
| 18 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/bootstrap-solaris.xml? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> it appears the cygwin guys have already encountered this one: |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> http://cygwin.com/ml/binutils/2005-08/msg00187.html |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> if you follow that thread, they have some patches, but I haven't looked |
| 25 |
> into it closely enough to tell if it would be relevant to my case. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Maybe... maybe not. On Solaris 10 coreutils compile with a path |
| 28 |
containing /usr/sfw/bin and /usr/sfw/i386-sun-solaris2.10/bin |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 32 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list |
Archives