| 1 |
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 12:13 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 11:56 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 18-05-2009 10:39:44 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > > Maybe this is something totally different, but doesn't the |
| 5 |
> > > > eclass/portage somewhere *remove* the executable bit of shared |
| 6 |
> > > > libraries? |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > hmm. have to look that up, but i guess what you mean is the handling |
| 9 |
> > > of .la files?. however it is strange because it is the _only_ .so that |
| 10 |
> > > is not executable. and of course non-executable shared libraries don't |
| 11 |
> > > work. |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > > i'd like to avoid a chmod a+x :) |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > Please check misc-functions.sh and isolated-functions.sh |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> mhm, right; /opt/gentoo/usr/lib/portage/bin/misc-functions.sh |
| 19 |
> (install_qa_check()) does all i want, and the code seems to be |
| 20 |
> well-written enough to get libintl.so*, and make it executable. however |
| 21 |
> it doesn't (and as i said, libintl is the only one) :( . |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> also it seems portage calls install_qa_check rather unconditionally, so |
| 24 |
> it shouldn't be the case that any pre_src_install (or any other hook) |
| 25 |
> makes the call to the function disappear. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> I'll do further investigation. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
something strange is happening here. at the time the install_qa_check |
| 30 |
verifies the executable bit on libintl.so.8.0.2, it seems to _be_ |
| 31 |
executable... but when it gets copied/moved to the final destination, |
| 32 |
the executable bit gets lost somehow - i can't find an explanation for |
| 33 |
it right now... any ideas? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Cheers, Markus |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> Cheers, Markus |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> > |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> |
Archives