| 1 |
Like Aaron said: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On 31-08-2010 16:09:31 -0700, Tom Ellis wrote: |
| 4 |
> What is the current state of fortran in prefix on mac? I tried to get some |
| 5 |
> scientific software into the prefix but got stopped at square one which is, |
| 6 |
> have a working fortran compiler. I looked in gmane and the most recent |
| 7 |
> discussion of fortran I found was the one I started 4 years ago. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I have a feeling this was a mac only problem since mac depends on gcc-apple |
| 10 |
> which has no fortran. or did depend - I sort of lost interest in prefix |
| 11 |
> when I couldn't use it to compile fortran on my mac with the convenient |
| 12 |
> ebuild system. maybe things have matured and advanced since then he inquired |
| 13 |
> hopefully? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Well, I'm not sure what you're exaclty looking for, but our gcc-apple |
| 16 |
these days has a fortan USE-flag, which just installs a gfortran for |
| 17 |
you: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
% gfortran --version |
| 20 |
GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.2.1 (Gentoo 4.2.1_p5664, Apple Inc. build 5664) |
| 21 |
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
So far it hasn't caused me any problems with software that requires |
| 24 |
fortran support, but I'm not a realy fortran user. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 29 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives