Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Aaron Wilson <tallest@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Preparing for Snow Leopard
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 18:31:14
Message-Id: D43954A2-6871-430E-88C9-1D741BAA049E@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] Preparing for Snow Leopard by Fabian Groffen
1 I'm pretty sure Tiger still had a 32-bit kernel, even though it had
2 some 64-bit support. Snow Leopard has both a 32-bit and 64-bit kernel,
3 but in almost all macs it boots the 32-bit kernel by default. See here:
4
5 http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-336194.html
6
7 I'm on IRC as tallest.
8
9 Thanks,
10 Aaron
11
12
13 On Sep 7, 2009, at 12:23 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
14
15 > On 07-09-2009 23:14:47 +0900, Tobias Hahn wrote:
16 >> SL still uses a 32 bit kernel by default. The 64 bit kernel is
17 >> optional on supported hardware (hold down 64 while booting). Only SL
18 >> Server on an xserve uses the 64 bit kernel by default iirc. I guess
19 >> the reasoning is to give consumer hardware vendors a chance to write
20 >> 64 bit kexts. On the other hand, most applications from Apple
21 >> (Finder,
22 >> Terminal, Safari...) now support 64 bit, but obviously also only if
23 >> the hardware supports it (so on a core not-2 duo everything will be
24 >> 32
25 >> bit as before).
26 >
27 > Hmmm, that sounds weird, even my Tiger can do 64-bits stuff (the
28 > kernel
29 > that is). That was the whole idea: being able to address much more
30 > memory. Anyway it obviously requires some scripting.
31 >
32 > Either we default to 32-bits Prefix on Snow Leopard too, or we figure
33 > out a way to see if we're running on a 64-bits capable machine so we
34 > can
35 > enable 64-bits on Snow Leopard where possible.
36 >
37 > Thanks for the info!
38 >
39 >
40 > --
41 > Fabian Groffen
42 > Gentoo on a different level
43 >