1 |
I'm pretty sure Tiger still had a 32-bit kernel, even though it had |
2 |
some 64-bit support. Snow Leopard has both a 32-bit and 64-bit kernel, |
3 |
but in almost all macs it boots the 32-bit kernel by default. See here: |
4 |
|
5 |
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-336194.html |
6 |
|
7 |
I'm on IRC as tallest. |
8 |
|
9 |
Thanks, |
10 |
Aaron |
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
On Sep 7, 2009, at 12:23 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
14 |
|
15 |
> On 07-09-2009 23:14:47 +0900, Tobias Hahn wrote: |
16 |
>> SL still uses a 32 bit kernel by default. The 64 bit kernel is |
17 |
>> optional on supported hardware (hold down 64 while booting). Only SL |
18 |
>> Server on an xserve uses the 64 bit kernel by default iirc. I guess |
19 |
>> the reasoning is to give consumer hardware vendors a chance to write |
20 |
>> 64 bit kexts. On the other hand, most applications from Apple |
21 |
>> (Finder, |
22 |
>> Terminal, Safari...) now support 64 bit, but obviously also only if |
23 |
>> the hardware supports it (so on a core not-2 duo everything will be |
24 |
>> 32 |
25 |
>> bit as before). |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Hmmm, that sounds weird, even my Tiger can do 64-bits stuff (the |
28 |
> kernel |
29 |
> that is). That was the whole idea: being able to address much more |
30 |
> memory. Anyway it obviously requires some scripting. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Either we default to 32-bits Prefix on Snow Leopard too, or we figure |
33 |
> out a way to see if we're running on a 64-bits capable machine so we |
34 |
> can |
35 |
> enable 64-bits on Snow Leopard where possible. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Thanks for the info! |
38 |
> |
39 |
> |
40 |
> -- |
41 |
> Fabian Groffen |
42 |
> Gentoo on a different level |
43 |
> |