| 1 |
On 31-07-2009 09:19:07 +0200, Torsten Veller wrote: |
| 2 |
> * Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>: |
| 3 |
> > > It was always package masked. |
| 4 |
> > > It pdepends on >=perl-core/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.30 which is not even in |
| 5 |
> > > prefix (and not in the gentoo). |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > That doesn't matter, the version existed, and there is no successor in |
| 8 |
> > the tree. Anyway, -r6 should be back in Prefix now. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Well, I can add a another masked and broken revision if that's what you |
| 11 |
> and your users expect :rolleyes: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I would expect such version never to enter gentoo-x86... but that's a |
| 14 |
totally different discussion. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I think the problem became in effect because the mask for -r7 was |
| 17 |
removed while Prefix kept the -r7 version in tree, because it it hard |
| 18 |
and sometimes impossible to keep a 1-1 sync of gentoo-x86/prefix. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 23 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives