| 1 |
Am 17.06.2014 22:51, schrieb Barry Schwartz: |
| 2 |
> Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> skribis: |
| 3 |
>> Am 17.06.2014 21:57, schrieb Barry Schwartz: |
| 4 |
>>> Frank Peters <frank.peters@×××××××.net> skribis: |
| 5 |
>>>> I appreciate your concern but, all too often it seems, the notion |
| 6 |
>>>> of "not a good idea" becomes "not a good idea therefore it should |
| 7 |
>>>> be irrevocably disabled for everyone whether they want it or not." |
| 8 |
>>> Yeah, that seems to be common. |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> There is a tug-of-war between the idea of Gentoo as (a) an OS like the |
| 11 |
>>> usual suspects except you can easily compile it yourself and (b) a |
| 12 |
>>> framework for rolling your own OS. I lean in preference towards (b). |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> (The xLFSes are suffering from the same tug-of-war.) |
| 15 |
>> so make yourself an overlay, put an ebuild with apropriate patches there |
| 16 |
>> and be happy. |
| 17 |
> I have _more than one_ overlay, hosted on Bitbucket. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I don't. I do not see the need. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Please try to be nice about this. Is it not even acceptable to discuss |
| 23 |
> that there is such a tug-of-war? Should discussions about the |
| 24 |
> balances of pros and cons in Gentoo take place in ‘discussion |
| 25 |
> overlays’? |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Was this thread started to 'discuss' something? No? Then why do you feel |
| 31 |
the need to start one? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Especially about something like ssp that hardly anybody should want to |
| 34 |
turn off? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
And I am nice. At the moment. |
Archives