1 |
On Friday 21 October 2005 01:49, Bob Young wrote: |
2 |
> I’m re-installing Gentoo64 yet-again on my dual Opteron box, this time I |
3 |
> want to build with nptl and nptlonly use flags starting from stage1. ( <- |
4 |
> I’ d welcome thoughts/opinions on this as well). |
5 |
> |
6 |
> In deciding on what other use flags I want, I noticed the pic flag, with |
7 |
> it’ s accompanying warning of “Do not utilize this flag unless you know |
8 |
> what you're doing.” So I figured I’d better do some research. I’ve read |
9 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/pic-guide.xml and |
10 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/pic-internals.xml. It seems that |
11 |
> using PIC is primarily a security feature/enhancement. The box is a |
12 |
> workstation, and has no public IP address, I’m more interested in |
13 |
> performance than security, but if the PIC adds significant security without |
14 |
> noticeably impacting performance on amd64, I’m wondering if adding the pic |
15 |
> use flag in make.conf might be a good idea. |
16 |
|
17 |
no it is not. |
18 |
Almost all ebuilds, supporting the PIC flag, have it set, the rest should not |
19 |
use it. |
20 |
>From what I remember, PIC on binaries make them a lot slower (and there is a |
21 |
reason nvidia does not use it for their libs. |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |