1 |
Duncan posted on Sat, 23 May 2015 08:17:59 +0000 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Off for a 1 AM sync and some testing, now... if I don't get too sleepy |
4 |
> to think straight first. Still 219 with those patches applied if 220 |
5 |
> isn't in-tree yet when I sync. I'll post back when I have some results. |
6 |
|
7 |
Well, back with a mixed report... still on 219_p112 as 220 still hadn't |
8 |
made it to the tree. |
9 |
|
10 |
Upstream's patch for the tmpfiles/subvolumes/dirs thing worked perfect. |
11 |
=:^) |
12 |
|
13 |
The gentoo-bug proposed patch to get IPv4-only working again... not so |
14 |
much. It addressed one complaint in the log, but that wasn't the major |
15 |
problem, apparently, and networkd still doesn't bring up the network |
16 |
properly. |
17 |
|
18 |
But, while I was testing, I tested something that another poster had |
19 |
noted on the upstream IPv4 bug -- networkd appears to be configuring the |
20 |
interface, just not bringing it up. So a simple ifconfig <iface> up |
21 |
(what I used, or equivalent IP command, which is what he used) brings the |
22 |
interface up, configured as it should be. =:^) |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
Between the two, I think I'll stick with 219_p112 instead of reverting |
26 |
back to 218-r3, for now. The tmpfiles.d thing is fixed by the upstream |
27 |
patch I dropped into /etc/portage/patches/sys-apps/systemd before the |
28 |
rebuild, and I can do a manual ifconfig up after reboot for now, or setup |
29 |
a quick service to automate it if I get tired of doing the manual ifconfig |
30 |
thing. |
31 |
|
32 |
So mixed report, but there's progress, and a workaround for the remaining |
33 |
issue, so 219_p112 with additional patches and a manual workaround it is, |
34 |
for now. =:^/ |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
38 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
39 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |