| 1 |
Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 20 May 2015 07:22:39 -0400 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> So, you can't use 219 because it lacks fixes to some bugs. Systemd-220 |
| 4 |
> will probably fix those, and change who-knows-what else. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
FWIW, systemd-220 is out upstream now, but there's not an in-tree gentoo |
| 7 |
ebuild for it yet (well, as of a bit under a day ago when I last updated). |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Here's a link to the article where I found out about it (it was on the |
| 10 |
lxer feed I subscribe to via claws-mail's feed-reader addon, but that was |
| 11 |
just a redirect to the below article, which I'm linking directly instead): |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
http://www.itrunsonlinux.com/desktopos/systemd-v220-released/ |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
The article pastes in the 220 changelog, apparently verbatim (minus the |
| 16 |
"contributors to this version" paragraph systemd normally puts at the end |
| 17 |
of each version's changelog). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
That should have the patch for my btrfs tmpfiles.d "v" vs. "d" bug, as it |
| 20 |
was committed before the 220 release, tho I've obviously not tested it |
| 21 |
yet. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
And while there's still no developer comment on the upstream IPv4 bug I'm |
| 24 |
CCed on, and as stated, no gentoo 220 yet, there's a patch from upstream |
| 25 |
for me to try on the gentoo IPv4 only bug I filed. Presumably, if it's |
| 26 |
from upstream, that should be in 220 as well, and if it works... |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Off for a 1 AM sync and some testing, now... if I don't get too sleepy to |
| 29 |
think straight first. Still 219 with those patches applied if 220 isn't |
| 30 |
in-tree yet when I sync. I'll post back when I have some results. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 34 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 35 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives