1 |
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:34:24 +0200 |
2 |
> |
3 |
> oh really? can mc present an audiocd as ogg/mp3/flac/wav files? |
4 |
> |
5 |
> I don't think so. |
6 |
|
7 |
I am not sure what is meant by "present an audio cd," but mc can be |
8 |
programmed by the user to accomplish a lot of tasks based on the |
9 |
file type. Therefore, although I have not researched this specific |
10 |
possibility, I would be inclined to believe that it can be done |
11 |
with mc. |
12 |
|
13 |
Most importantly, mc could do it without requiring the support of |
14 |
hundreds of extra libraries. The more complex a structure, the more |
15 |
difficult it becomes to eliminate or even locate problems and flaws. |
16 |
|
17 |
One can also argue that the whole idea of an evolving graphical |
18 |
interface is a fallacy. Human beings do not need any new and improved |
19 |
methods for interacting with a computer. In my opinion, the GUI had |
20 |
reached its peak way back in 1995. Nothing else needs to be done. |
21 |
Current GUI designs should be sufficient for the next thousand years. |
22 |
|
23 |
> well, I am just saying that even if Frank things highly integrated, code and |
24 |
> functionanilty sharing DEs might be superfluos I am thinking the exact |
25 |
> opposite. |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
It's all a matter of personal preference and philosophy. I am a minimalist |
29 |
at heart and I'm sure a lot of other people are as well. For me, using |
30 |
a computer means interacting closely with the hardware without the intervention |
31 |
of a thick layer of GUI. I derive much satisfaction with being able to write |
32 |
bash scripts or perl/python code to do jobs that other users could probably |
33 |
accomplish with a few mouse clicks within KDE or Gnome. To me, the whole |
34 |
point of computing is to be in total awareness and control of the computer. |
35 |
Fortunately, Linux (and Gentoo) still provides that minimalist opportunity. |
36 |
|
37 |
Frank Peters |