1 |
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Hi all, |
3 |
> What would be a sufficient set of actions for me to take to get |
4 |
> backtrace info from Wine that would be useful to Wine devlopers? Their |
5 |
> Bugzilla folks are are saying, correctly I think, that everything |
6 |
> necessary is stripped out and that the info I'm providing doesn't |
7 |
> help. I don't see anything specific in the Wine flags. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Is this some sort of major effort required where I have to go back |
10 |
> and recompile many things on my system or is there a way to compile |
11 |
> just Wine to give them what they need? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I found this page to read: |
14 |
> |
15 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/backtraces.xml |
16 |
> |
17 |
> I do not understand the nostrip/splitdebug topic. I do not find |
18 |
> either word in man emerge or man portage. Is this a gcc thing? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> My current gcc flags look like this: |
21 |
> |
22 |
> CFLAGS="-march=k8 -O2 -pipe" |
23 |
> CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" |
24 |
> CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" |
25 |
> MAKEOPTS="-j2" |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Any comments about whether those are good or not for a |
28 |
> non-developer, desktop user type like me would be appreciated. I don't |
29 |
> mind changing cflags to get these folks what they want. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> Thanks, |
32 |
> Mark |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
OK, so this seems to be part of using the FEATURES=" ... " line in make.conf. |
36 |
|
37 |
I do not have a FEATURES line at all so I'm hesitant to just start |
38 |
throwing things in. <<glug...help...>> |
39 |
|
40 |
I've heard of things like sandbox and ccache but I've never touched |
41 |
them. Would they be good things to use all the time or are they more |
42 |
for developers? |
43 |
|
44 |
Anyway, if someone can help clear this up I would appreciate it. |
45 |
|
46 |
Thanks, |
47 |
Mark |
48 |
-- |
49 |
gentoo-amd64@l.g.o mailing list |