1 |
Duncan schrieb: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Meanwhile, kde4.3.0 still has issues with xinerama (what SB calls |
4 |
> "big screen") mode in some cases (including mine), too. |
5 |
|
6 |
If I would mean xinerama I would say so. Maybe I am pedantic but |
7 |
xinerama is only a deprecated extension of the X-server, that I never |
8 |
had installed because I didn't need it here because I never even want to |
9 |
stretch my desktop to more then one physical monitor or want to move |
10 |
programms from one display to another by drag and drop. I see that it |
11 |
can be usefull but that what I want is usefull and needed too. |
12 |
|
13 |
> But I've seen several mentions that the problem has been fixed in |
14 |
> trunk, for 4.4, and the fix may or may not make it into 4.3.x. |
15 |
|
16 |
I tested this patch and for my setup without xinerama or xrandr it works |
17 |
like I have it under kde3. One screen with kde on the monitor, one |
18 |
screen only with the black X root window on the TV. |
19 |
With that I wait for kde 4.4 (or 4.3.1 if it gets backported) to give |
20 |
kde a fifth chance. |
21 |
|
22 |
> 4.3 might actually be able to do this now. Each 4.X release has |
23 |
> VASTLY improved plasma, so far, and in this area 4.2 was finally |
24 |
> becoming semi- usable and 4.3 is actually very reasonable, now. If |
25 |
> small is what you want, 4.3 really does allow small now. I have one |
26 |
> panel set as small as it'll allow, looks like 12 px high (horizonal |
27 |
> panel). |
28 |
|
29 |
As 4.3 is still unuseable for me because of the "two different sized |
30 |
screens on one"-bug I mentioned before I can't test that right now and |
31 |
have to wait for kde 4.4. But the live-builds I tried to test the patch |
32 |
had the same problems with scaling icons on small bars. |
33 |
|
34 |
> IIRC the minimum in kicker was 24 px? |
35 |
|
36 |
Yes it is and 24px would be absolutly fine for me but here it didn't |
37 |
work, as a lot of the icons don't scale if reduced to smaller than 40px. |
38 |
They get cut and I have only have half icons. |
39 |
|
40 |
> But I finally got so fed up with amarok I found a different solution. |
41 |
> They killed all the functionality I actually used, while adding a |
42 |
> bunch of junk I'm not interested in. |
43 |
|
44 |
That is exact my point. Hurray a lot of new fancy dingelings but lack of |
45 |
needed and used functions like generic usb audioplayer support. |
46 |
|
47 |
> Have they gotten the winamp/xmms skinnable mini-player back yet? |
48 |
|
49 |
Not the last time I looked into it (a few days after 4.3 was out). |
50 |
|
51 |
> And I never /did/ use all that fancy scoring and etc. functionality. |
52 |
|
53 |
They put so much new stuff in there, why not a import function for the |
54 |
old amarok 1.4 database? I mean one that works and not only imports 10 |
55 |
or so records. |
56 |
|
57 |
> Thus, they can go their way and I'll go mine. |
58 |
|
59 |
I would do that too, but there is no player that fits my needs as much |
60 |
as it amarok 1.4 does and so I think that I use it even if I switch when |
61 |
kde 4.4 is out. I have 8GB RAM so the bloat that comes with it can be |
62 |
absorbed. |
63 |
|
64 |
> I decided there were simply better options available. |
65 |
|
66 |
Could you name a few? |
67 |
|
68 |
What I miss in kde 4.x so far is the run command kicker applet that I |
69 |
had in kde3 as my main way of starting apps. In kde4 I have to use the |
70 |
shortcut to get krunner (is it the name?) and type it there. And I don't |
71 |
like krunner. I don't want any suggestions, I know what I am about to |
72 |
start, thank you. |
73 |
|
74 |
Oh and I miss the weather applet, and the kworldclock background image |
75 |
and… and… and… |
76 |
|
77 |
Can't they just add a feature so that kde4 looks and feels and behaves |
78 |
as kde3 did? Yes I know that it is a dream, but sometimes dreams really |
79 |
come true. |
80 |
|
81 |
Greetings |
82 |
|
83 |
Sebastian |