Archives
Archives
| From: | Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl@×××××××××××.at> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-amd64@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Wow! KDE 3.5.1 & Xorg 7.0 w/ Composite | ||
| Date: | Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:46:38 | ||
| Message-Id: | 43F5B744.9070509@getdesigned.at | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Wow! KDE 3.5.1 & Xorg 7.0 w/ Composite by Peter Humphrey |
||
| 1 | Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | >Duncan wrote: |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | >If so, it still stands. This use of 'enabled' to mean 'set' is just plain |
| 7 | >wrong. Sorry if that offends anyone. |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | Wrong? Language evolves. It always has, and it always will. In modern |
| 11 | technical usage, "enable" can mean the same as "activate". Grumbling |
| 12 | won't help. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Sebastian Redl |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Wow! KDE 3.5.1 & Xorg 7.0 w/ Composite | Peter Humphrey <prh@××××××××××.uk> |