1 |
On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 05:13 -0700, Duncan wrote: |
2 |
> To date (thru 4.0.1), gcc treats all the amd64 family the same -- they are |
3 |
> all aliased to each other, so to with them, it doesn't matter. |
4 |
|
5 |
so i should use the x86 version of gentoo with amd64 make flags? does |
6 |
that mean i need to somehow use gcc 4.0.1 when bootstrapping? |
7 |
|
8 |
> I've seen some debate on the the newer processors, however, which have |
9 |
> sse3, sempron included, AFAIK, and can't say I know enough about that to |
10 |
> say for sure what's best there. For the vast majority of packages, any of |
11 |
> the amd64 aliases will be optimal as they'd not likely use sse3 anyway. |
12 |
> The exception would be any heavy multimedia or video, particularly |
13 |
> encoding and decoding, but also possibly xorg/mesa. On that stuff, sse3 |
14 |
> could make a difference and I don't know what would be best. (Note that in |
15 |
> practice, support for sse3, as the newest addition in any case, may not be |
16 |
> fully optimized yet, particularly on 64-bit. Look for better support there |
17 |
> by gcc 4.1 or 4.2, after the potential of gcc 4 has had some time to |
18 |
> mature as well.) |
19 |
|
20 |
err, that's just confusing me so i'll just ignore it. :) |
21 |
|
22 |
thanks, |
23 |
alvin |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Alvin Thompson |
27 |
|
28 |
Navy: 42 |
29 |
Army: 13 |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |