| 1 |
Well with stable versions of the 2 xf86 packages xorg-server & ati-drivers |
| 2 |
X does not start saying fglrx module is not found. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I modprobe fglrx & tried again with same error. Sorry can't send actual |
| 5 |
errors as can't load email, stuck in console mode. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On 6 Oct 2016 3:57 pm, "Daiajo Tibdixious" <daiajo@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> Doing this on phone as chromium update still going (in console mode). |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Ati-drivers-15.12-r1 requires xorg-server-1.17.4 or less, yet world update |
| 12 |
> insists on pulling in xorg-server-1.8 which then pulls in masked versions |
| 13 |
> of xf86-input-evdev & xf86-video-ati & and the emerge dies because the 2 |
| 14 |
> versions of xorg-server can't co-exist. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I want ati-drivers as my led screen does not look good with basic radeon |
| 17 |
> driver. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> I am wondering why masked versions are being pulled in as nothing in |
| 20 |
> package.accept_keywords nor package.unmask |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> In world I just have xorg-x11 meta package. I'm wondering if I should |
| 23 |
> replace that with specific packages. The ebuild does not suggest its |
| 24 |
> pulling in the 1.8 version, but I may be miss-reading it. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> I have manually installed the latest stable versions of the affected |
| 27 |
> packages & expect it to work. |
| 28 |
> |
Archives