| 1 |
On Thu, 10 May 2012 15:07:09 +0200 |
| 2 |
Benny Pedersen <me@××××.org> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> why not ext4 ?, imho ext4 is more caple of so big drives, specially on |
| 6 |
> fsck, my own qnap ts 419 p+ supports both so it must be good :=) |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
My plan for the drive is long-term and portable storage of digital files. |
| 10 |
The idea is basically write once, read many. Also, the drive has been |
| 11 |
formatted into several smaller partitions. For this kind of use I don't |
| 12 |
need the capabilities of ext4. In fact I don't even need a journal and |
| 13 |
could probably use ext2 just as well. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Frank Peters |
Archives