| 1 |
2009/1/2 Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl@×××××××××××.at>: |
| 2 |
> Beso wrote: |
| 3 |
>> you need also to enable damage and render extension in the extensions |
| 4 |
>> section. here's what |
| 5 |
>> ity should look like: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Section "Extensions" |
| 8 |
>> Option "DAMAGE" "true" |
| 9 |
>> Option "RENDER" "true" |
| 10 |
>> Option "Composite" "Enable" |
| 11 |
>> EndSection |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> you'll also need to enable texturedrender in your device section to |
| 15 |
>> enable the Xv. i've been not |
| 16 |
>> using fglrx for some months now (the xf86-video-ati is quite enough |
| 17 |
>> for my needs) and i don't |
| 18 |
>> remember all the hacks that are available for fglrx driver. look at |
| 19 |
>> the phoronix forums for more |
| 20 |
>> detailed configuration infos about fglrx. |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
> Thank you. |
| 23 |
>> by the way, what ati board do you posses?! maybe the xf86-video-ati is |
| 24 |
>> better than fglrx for |
| 25 |
>> your needs (it has xv, exa and opengl acceleration for boards till r500). |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
> R515, so in theory, the radeon or radeonhd drivers should work. In |
| 29 |
> practice, I had nothing but trouble with them on my experimental setup. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
the radeon driver has your board inside the supported boards. it has 3d accel, |
| 32 |
textured render, uses exa (which is better than xaa), has tear free x-video and |
| 33 |
other goodies. anyway, with fglrx you might still have a better |
| 34 |
performance (with |
| 35 |
xaa) since the tuning of the radeon driver is still not as the one from fglrx. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
dott. ing. beso |
Archives