1 |
Well, that was also an enlightening e-mail. I just disabled and deleted |
2 |
all cookies in Firefox, and now I'm going to do as Richard described and |
3 |
setup my own e-mail account. Any good ideas/howto's about how to setup a |
4 |
mail server? |
5 |
|
6 |
-Peter |
7 |
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 00:08 +0000, Duncan wrote: |
8 |
> Peter Davoust <worldgnat@×××××.com> posted |
9 |
> 1160322174.2818.6.camel@×××××××××.localdomain, excerpted below, on Sun, |
10 |
> 08 Oct 2006 11:42:54 -0400: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> > You bring up an issue I wanted to ask about: Why wouldn't you use gmail as |
13 |
> > your personal e-mail? I've heard people saying it's evil, and that google |
14 |
> > is fascist, but I don't really know what to believe. Personally I like the |
15 |
> > features that gmail offers, and I think it's great that it stores all my |
16 |
> > mail ever sent so I can access my old e-mails still if my hard drive gets |
17 |
> > wiped (which happens accidentally or not every month or so). Thoughts? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> For me (as it would seem the OP), it's the whole privacy thing. Google |
20 |
> mines the data to serve ads, and associates that with your search profile |
21 |
> as well (same google-wide master cookie, if I'm not mistaken). While |
22 |
> supposedly no one ever looks at that, only machines, corporate policies |
23 |
> can and do change. As well, if the data is there, it is subject to search |
24 |
> warrant or with Bush run rampant over civil liberties, now with little or |
25 |
> no control whatsoever -- all they have to do is say it's national security |
26 |
> related to grab any existing records, pretty much, and it's getting worse, |
27 |
> not better. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Yes, there's the same deal to some extent with any mail, specifically |
30 |
> anything that's not encrypted, even if both ends run their own servers, |
31 |
> because it travels over the public internet and is subject to logging |
32 |
> there. However, as I mentioned, I don't like the whole web interface |
33 |
> thing that much either, and then there's the whole thing with the same |
34 |
> company holding the search profile as well. As it is, I don't do cookies |
35 |
> from Google as they are (with most of the rest of the net) set for no |
36 |
> cookies (or session-only) by default. If google has a search profile on |
37 |
> me, it's by IP only, and that changes. To get the link, they'd need to |
38 |
> talk to my ISP, and while government can do that, one would hope google |
39 |
> wouldn't be able to get that info from the ISP. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> So it's a personal privacy thing. No big deal for me tho as I never did |
42 |
> their mail in the first place, so I just don't start. As for others, it's |
43 |
> up to them. What they choose to do is their business. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> -- |
46 |
> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
47 |
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
48 |
> and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
49 |
> |
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |