Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Peter Davoust <worldgnat@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: newcomer:
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:23:21
Message-Id: 1160353054.22548.14.camel@localhost.localdomain
In Reply to: [gentoo-amd64] Re: newcomer: by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 Well, that was also an enlightening e-mail. I just disabled and deleted
2 all cookies in Firefox, and now I'm going to do as Richard described and
3 setup my own e-mail account. Any good ideas/howto's about how to setup a
4 mail server?
5
6 -Peter
7 On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 00:08 +0000, Duncan wrote:
8 > Peter Davoust <worldgnat@×××××.com> posted
9 > 1160322174.2818.6.camel@×××××××××.localdomain, excerpted below, on Sun,
10 > 08 Oct 2006 11:42:54 -0400:
11 >
12 > > You bring up an issue I wanted to ask about: Why wouldn't you use gmail as
13 > > your personal e-mail? I've heard people saying it's evil, and that google
14 > > is fascist, but I don't really know what to believe. Personally I like the
15 > > features that gmail offers, and I think it's great that it stores all my
16 > > mail ever sent so I can access my old e-mails still if my hard drive gets
17 > > wiped (which happens accidentally or not every month or so). Thoughts?
18 >
19 > For me (as it would seem the OP), it's the whole privacy thing. Google
20 > mines the data to serve ads, and associates that with your search profile
21 > as well (same google-wide master cookie, if I'm not mistaken). While
22 > supposedly no one ever looks at that, only machines, corporate policies
23 > can and do change. As well, if the data is there, it is subject to search
24 > warrant or with Bush run rampant over civil liberties, now with little or
25 > no control whatsoever -- all they have to do is say it's national security
26 > related to grab any existing records, pretty much, and it's getting worse,
27 > not better.
28 >
29 > Yes, there's the same deal to some extent with any mail, specifically
30 > anything that's not encrypted, even if both ends run their own servers,
31 > because it travels over the public internet and is subject to logging
32 > there. However, as I mentioned, I don't like the whole web interface
33 > thing that much either, and then there's the whole thing with the same
34 > company holding the search profile as well. As it is, I don't do cookies
35 > from Google as they are (with most of the rest of the net) set for no
36 > cookies (or session-only) by default. If google has a search profile on
37 > me, it's by IP only, and that changes. To get the link, they'd need to
38 > talk to my ISP, and while government can do that, one would hope google
39 > wouldn't be able to get that info from the ISP.
40 >
41 > So it's a personal privacy thing. No big deal for me tho as I never did
42 > their mail in the first place, so I just don't start. As for others, it's
43 > up to them. What they choose to do is their business.
44 >
45 > --
46 > Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
47 > "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
48 > and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
49 >
50
51 --
52 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-amd64] Re: newcomer: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: newcomer: Richard Freeman <rich@××××××××××××××.net>