| 1 |
* Florian D. <flockmock@×××.at> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Hi folks, |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I just joined this list yesterday, so I miss parts of this thread ... |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> That is a good question. I cannot support all the votes for kmail. If |
| 8 |
> you want to switch to mdir based mailboxes and you want to use kmail |
| 9 |
> just as a local mailbox reader, the first thing that kmail does, is to |
| 10 |
> move all your mails into some obscure ~/kde3.5/share/apps/kmail/... |
| 11 |
> directory. After that, your mails are not available for other |
| 12 |
> mail-clients any more. nice behaviour, isn't it? |
| 13 |
> I couldn't find a way to tell kmail not to do that, but to read the |
| 14 |
> mails from the preconfigured place instead. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Last time I tried it was years ago, I didn't like it. Too fat |
| 17 |
(requires the whole KDE stuff) and too complicated in use. |
| 18 |
I'm actually an mutt guy, sometimes using seamonkey's mail stuff. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The only reason for installing TB is the support for RSS feeds |
| 21 |
(mutt IMHO doesnt have this yet). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Evrything could be much easier, if every MUA just used 9p-mailfs, |
| 24 |
and the actual mailbox (and remote protocol) handling is done |
| 25 |
in the 9p server ;-o |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
cu |
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 31 |
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
| 32 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 33 |
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
| 34 |
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
| 35 |
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
| 36 |
http://patches.metux.de/ |
| 37 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives