Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Anyone tried xorg-server-1.2.99.901?
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:49:52
Message-Id: pan.2007.03.17.23.47.58@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Anyone tried xorg-server-1.2.99.901? by "B. Nice"
1 "B. Nice" <anonymous.pseudonym.88@×××××.com> posted
2 1174159371.6186.10.camel@××××××××××.Workgroup, excerpted below, on Sat,
3 17 Mar 2007 15:22:51 -0400:
4
5 > Who's right. Who cares. IMNSHO it is extremely ignorant and arrogant to
6 > assume that one philosophy is superior to the other. Hopefully with the
7 > major and minor Desktop Environments competing, everyone can be
8 > satisfied.
9
10 Agreed. GNOME drives me to distraction, but apparently some folks like
11 it. Variety is what FLOSS is good at, so let's celebrate the
12 differences, and be glad there remains the choice. =8^)
13
14 Another way to look at it is that all the devs that like the dumbed down
15 interface will be attracted to GNOME, leaving KDE in less danger of
16 having them come in and try to dumb it down too. Of course the reverse
17 is true as well, the folks that like to have everything customizable will
18 be attracted to KDE, leaving the GNOME folks in relative peace to do it
19 their way. As long as the GNOME folks stay there and don't try to dumb
20 down KDE, I'm happy, and I'm sure many GNOME users say the same about KDE
21 devs and "needless complexity".
22
23 --
24 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
25 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
26 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
27
28 --
29 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list