| 1 |
On Sunday 20 May 2007 22:35:12 Nuitari wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I've noticed the same problem and I think that it should be up to boinc |
| 4 |
> to set that up properly |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Thanks for verifying that it's not just me. Do you also use a Supermicro |
| 7 |
H8DCE? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I did raise a bug report with BOINC a few weeks ago, after a long search for |
| 10 |
their bug system, but it was closed with no action. When I say "no action" |
| 11 |
I mean that I received no acknowledgement of the creation of the report, |
| 12 |
nor of its change of status; and when the report was closed, it was "moved |
| 13 |
to trac", whatever that is, with an http link to a page from which I |
| 14 |
couldn't find a single trace of fault reports. Evidently my bug report had |
| 15 |
been buried, and I see no sign of any recognition that they might have a |
| 16 |
problem in their scheduling algorithm. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Readers with long memories may remember that I lost my temper with them and |
| 19 |
asked on this list for ways of deleting my existence from the BOINC |
| 20 |
project. I later relented and decided to have a go myself, but this is as |
| 21 |
far as I've got. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Rgds |
| 25 |
Peter Humphrey |
| 26 |
Linux Counter 5290, Aug 93 |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives