1 |
Lie Ryan posted on Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:20:45 +1100 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 09/29/10 03:03, Zhu Sha Zang wrote: |
4 |
>> I have some machines running gentoo and every machine running under |
5 |
>> AMD Processors (64-bit profile), everything is right. Every source code |
6 |
>> compile fine. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>> But, some machines, i've installed under Intel Core 2 Quad or i7 |
9 |
>> processor and this machines have problem compile especific 2 packages: |
10 |
|
11 |
>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64" |
12 |
> |
13 |
> I doubt you would want that. |
14 |
|
15 |
Why not? |
16 |
|
17 |
That statement implies that you don't either don't understand what |
18 |
keywords are all about, or you don't understand what that specific keyword |
19 |
means. |
20 |
|
21 |
If the statement is taken in the one context, if he's running the 64-bit |
22 |
x86 instruction set, on Gentoo, the keyword for it is amd64, regardless of |
23 |
who (AMD, Intel, Via...) makes the chip it's running on. For one thing, |
24 |
Gentoo's support for that instruction set originated before anyone else |
25 |
had picked it up, and AMD called it AMD64.[1] |
26 |
|
27 |
That's why this list is the gentoo/amd64 list as well, because that's what |
28 |
Gentoo calls the arch/instruction-set, regardless of who creates the |
29 |
hardware. |
30 |
|
31 |
Unless of course you're arguing that he likely wants ~amd64 instead, |
32 |
which /is/ something that could be argued (I run ~amd64 on my 64-bit |
33 |
machine and ~x86 on my 32-bit-only Atom netbook...). But that's going to |
34 |
require a /lot/ more than a simple "I doubt you would want that" in |
35 |
reference to the stable version, to back up /that/ argument, to the point |
36 |
I can't see anyone logically making the claim you made in that context, |
37 |
either. |
38 |
|
39 |
---- |
40 |
[1] For another, AMD originated it, and that's what they call it, so it |
41 |
can be argued that is it's "proper" name, even if generically, x86_64 also |
42 |
often used (as it is for the kernel, but due to the _ it's harder to |
43 |
type), or x64 (which is confusing for a few reasons, not the least of |
44 |
which is that 64 is less than 86, but it's the newer and arguably "better" |
45 |
instruction set, but I do think MS uses it), or by Intel as em64t or some |
46 |
such. |
47 |
|
48 |
-- |
49 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
50 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
51 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |