1 |
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Bob Sanders <rsanders@×××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> Mark Knecht, mused, then expounded: |
3 |
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
4 |
>> > Mark Knecht posted on Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:10:04 -0700 as excerpted: |
5 |
>> > |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> Basic Machine - ASUS Rampage II Extreme motherboard (4/1/2010) + 24GB |
8 |
>> DDR3 + Core i7-980x Extreme 12 core processor |
9 |
> |
10 |
> The hit to iop performance is mainly due to the large number of cores in |
11 |
> the the high end Intel cpu. I suggest you find a nice 4-core Intel |
12 |
> processor, something non-extreme. you'll find all your IO will improve. |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
Interesting point but not likely to happen. I run 3 Windows VMs all |
16 |
day, most of which are doing numerical calculations and not a huge |
17 |
amount of IO in the Windows environment itself. In my usage model the |
18 |
12 cores get a workout nearly every day. |
19 |
|
20 |
> |
21 |
>> 1 SDD - 120GB SATA3 on it's own controller |
22 |
>> 5+ HDD - WD5002ABYS RAID Edition 3 SATA3 drives using Intel integrated |
23 |
>> controllers |
24 |
>> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Again, if you're serious about RAID, get an LSI MegaRAID card. While I |
27 |
> have my dislikes about the LSI controller, it's a lot faster than using |
28 |
> MD and much faster (and more reliable) than any bios software RAID. |
29 |
> |
30 |
|
31 |
I suppose if I accept your assertion above then an LSI MegaRAID might |
32 |
be a better solution specifically because I _am_ using the 12 core |
33 |
Extreme processor. |
34 |
|
35 |
Will consider, at least in the long run, if this thread & work doesn't |
36 |
yield significantly improved results over the next few weeks. |
37 |
|
38 |
> Oh, and don't believe all the published numbers on drives, |
39 |
> etc...benchmarking is an art. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Bob |
42 |
|
43 |
Absolutely! :-) |
44 |
|
45 |
Thanks, |
46 |
Mark |