1 |
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
3 |
> > "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@×××××.com> posted |
4 |
> > 5bdc1c8b0803070921xbc44366we4b3d6b3d9615bfd@××××××××××.com, excerpted |
5 |
> > below, on Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:21:51 -0800: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > > I'm not finding confcache or anything that's the obvious right choice on |
9 |
> > > that one. I'll emerge ccache though. |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > Yeah... confcache was an experiment that has been shelved for the time |
12 |
> > being. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> <SNIP> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > For people who'd prefer to have portage "just work" with the least |
19 |
> > hassle, even if it takes a bit longer on some packages, confcache is |
20 |
> > definitely something you want to leave alone, at least for now. Maybe |
21 |
> > someday... |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > -- |
24 |
> > Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Thanks Duncan. Can you suggest what I minimally need to change to get |
27 |
> good backtrace data out of Wine. I've added ccache, run the command |
28 |
> ccache -M 2G and rebuilt Wine at this point. Just figured I could do |
29 |
> that in the background while I Waited for someone more experience like |
30 |
> you to come along and tell me the right way to do it. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> Thanks, |
33 |
> Mark |
34 |
> |
35 |
Sorry. Also added |
36 |
|
37 |
FEATURES="parallel-fetch distclean ccache confcache splitdebug" |
38 |
|
39 |
to make.conf |
40 |
-- |
41 |
gentoo-amd64@l.g.o mailing list |