| 1 |
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@×××××.com> posted |
| 3 |
> 5bdc1c8b0803070921xbc44366we4b3d6b3d9615bfd@××××××××××.com, excerpted |
| 4 |
> below, on Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:21:51 -0800: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > I'm not finding confcache or anything that's the obvious right choice on |
| 8 |
> > that one. I'll emerge ccache though. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Yeah... confcache was an experiment that has been shelved for the time |
| 11 |
> being. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
<SNIP> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> For people who'd prefer to have portage "just work" with the least |
| 17 |
> hassle, even if it takes a bit longer on some packages, confcache is |
| 18 |
> definitely something you want to leave alone, at least for now. Maybe |
| 19 |
> someday... |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> -- |
| 22 |
> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Thanks Duncan. Can you suggest what I minimally need to change to get |
| 25 |
good backtrace data out of Wine. I've added ccache, run the command |
| 26 |
ccache -M 2G and rebuilt Wine at this point. Just figured I could do |
| 27 |
that in the background while I Waited for someone more experience like |
| 28 |
you to come along and tell me the right way to do it. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Thanks, |
| 31 |
Mark |
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-amd64@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives