1 |
On Monday 30 October 2006 20:19, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: |
2 |
> you have experienced it. You just don't see it. Somewhere in your |
3 |
> filesystem are files, that should not be there. Files, that portage |
4 |
> does not know about and that won't be removed, when the package gets |
5 |
> uninstalled. |
6 |
I ran findcruft some months ago, and it found some cruft around, but |
7 |
nothing really dangerous. Of course was impossible to track back every |
8 |
mud spot... |
9 |
|
10 |
> If a package does not build with sandbox, it is broken. Open a bug. |
11 |
Anyway, I just followed your advice and unset "-sandbox" fom my |
12 |
FEATURES. I really don't need it (anymore). |
13 |
|
14 |
If anything tries to escape its sandbox should be considered potentially |
15 |
dangerous, lesson learned. |
16 |
|
17 |
Thanks |
18 |
Francesco |
19 |
-- |
20 |
Linux Version 2.6.18-gentoo-r1, Compiled #1 PREEMPT Wed Oct 18 22:52:55 |
21 |
CEST 2006 |
22 |
One 1.8GHz AMD Athlon 64 Processor, 2GB RAM, 3607.13 Bogomips Total |
23 |
aemaeth |
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |