| 1 |
2009/1/26 Jesús Guerrero <i92guboj@×××××.es>: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Mon, January 26, 2009 20:39, Beso wrote: |
| 4 |
>> 2009/1/26 Jesús Guerrero <i92guboj@×××××.es>: |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> The only reason I suggest you the alpha version is because previous |
| 7 |
>>> flash versions have not support for 64 bits, hence, you will need |
| 8 |
>>> multilib to use them. The latest alpha has finally been ported to |
| 9 |
>>> x86_64, which means that it's now a native 64 bit application, and |
| 10 |
>>> doesn't need multilib to run on a 64 bits system. |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>> it's more correct to say that this version is ONLY 64bit and won't |
| 13 |
>> work for 32bit apps. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Thanks for pointing it out. I had no idea that it was and x86_64 only |
| 16 |
> release. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
and it's a linux only release. there isn't a 64bit release for other |
| 19 |
oses like windows or solaris. |
| 20 |
in fact it's hard masked in portage for this reason. the final release |
| 21 |
should have 64bit plugins |
| 22 |
for both windows, linux and osx, but maybe not for solaris. i think |
| 23 |
that this has been pushed |
| 24 |
out due to apple declaring that it will completely drop 32bit and use |
| 25 |
only 64bit on the next |
| 26 |
osx release. for this reason, adobe, which has as best customer apple |
| 27 |
users won't remain |
| 28 |
behind with this. i expect more 64bit releases for all adobe products |
| 29 |
until end of 2009, but |
| 30 |
maybe they will be at first available only for osx. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
dott. ing. beso |
Archives