| 1 |
On Wednesday 05 October 2005 05:40, Jared Lindsay wrote: |
| 2 |
> Eh? Like to destroy filesystems? Not sure what nitro you're talking |
| 3 |
> about... |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I am not sure if it was nitro, love or any other of the 'forum kernels'. |
| 7 |
But even if nitro was not the fs-damaging one, why don't we ask ciaranm what |
| 8 |
he thinks about nitro: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
>Try using a non-broken set of kernel sources. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
well, that was pretty clear, but wait, there are more, like this one: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
>| This almost sounds like the start of a flame war. Everyone has their |
| 15 |
>| opinion and is entitled to it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
>Yes, but some of them (for example, anyone advocating love- or nitro-) |
| 18 |
>are wrong. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
or this little piece: |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> | I'm using 2.6.9-nitro1 now. |
| 23 |
> | anyone met with the same problem? How to solve it? |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Stop using broken kernels. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
You can find more by just typing 'ciaranm' and 'nitro' into the search engine |
| 28 |
of your choice. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Ok, it is only one voice of reason, but I never found a dev advocating |
| 31 |
nitro-sources - only forum-users. |
| 32 |
And that should ring one or two bells. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Glück Auf |
| 35 |
Volker |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives