Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Beso <givemesugarr@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: glibc-2.6.1 cpu error
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:31:56
Message-Id: d257c3560710171419k6c821d8fm70b60547a38de390@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-amd64] Re: glibc-2.6.1 cpu error by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 2007/10/17, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>:
2 >
3 > Beso <givemesugarr@×××××.com> posted
4 > d257c3560710171006i2ae2af28q64922c7c3f3416ac@××××××××××.com , excerpted
5 > below, on Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:06:29 +0200:
6 >
7 > > i don't want to chroot to another profile just to use a 32bit double
8 > > firefox.... i'm using 64bit firefox with wrapper and 32bit apps and it
9 > > runs quite well. i don't want to use a double thing. there are lesser
10 > > apps that go only on 32bit so i hope that i won't need the multilib
11 > > profile for long....
12 > > anyway the find would remove me some crosscompilers, fact that i don't
13 > > want.... and now i don't what the heck has happened since i can't
14 > > compile anymore.... it gives me errors on gcc compiler.... i'll try
15 > > reemerging it and see if i can do it.... i can't do it what should i
16 > > do?!
17 >
18 > [Referencing this bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133209 ]
19 >
20 > If you are using the find in my comment (#39), then it's probably /not/
21 > the cross-compilers directly, but rather some wrappers for them that
22 > eselect-compiler left behind, that are now causing problems. That find
23 > is specifically on a string that only occurred in eselect-compiler (aka
24 > gcc-config-2.0-preX) and in the wrappers it placed, so shouldn't list
25 > anything other than them.
26
27
28 never used eselect-compiler. mine is a 2,5 months old gentoo fresh install
29 due to a disk change with backup gone wild. eselect-compiler has never got
30 into my system. the wrappers were inserted manually by me when i needed them
31 to make icecream work (i didn't have to do almost anything since icecream
32 functions quite well without wrappers).
33
34 If you are using the earlier find, as the comment explains, you may be
35 > getting false-hits due to the screwed quoting in the original find
36 > (comment 25, problems noted in 35), thus my cautioning to be sure and
37 > read thru to my comment, thus using that find rather than the original
38 > one.
39
40
41 i've used the 25th comment command. i've moved the indicated files to a
42 backup dir and then done a gcc-config -f x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.1.2 and
43 retried compiling glibc but no luck. i've tried with an older version and by
44 disabling and enabling ccache but i had no luck.
45
46 ps. i don't really want to compile again all the entire system.
47
48 >
49 > Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
50 > "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
51 > and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
52 >
53 > --
54 > gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list
55 >
56 >
57
58
59 --
60 dott. ing. beso

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-amd64] Re: glibc-2.6.1 cpu error Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>