1 |
Jesús Guerrero posted on Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:18:56 +0200 as excerpted: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Fri, August 28, 2009 01:52, Duncan wrote: |
4 |
>> Jesús Guerrero posted on Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:08:07 +0200 as excerpted: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>>> Just for the record, things like compiz work preferctly in an nvidia |
8 |
>>> 6200, agp. They will work without a problem in an hd2600 which is a |
9 |
>>> much |
10 |
>>> better card, agp as well. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> Hmm, I wasn't aware the Radeons (I assume you're talking about here, I |
13 |
>> don't even bother with nVidia any more and have no idea their model |
14 |
>> numbers) had AGP available beyond the r5xx (thru x1950) series. Got a |
15 |
>> link? But I hadn't finished researching and actually bought, either. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/category/category_slc.asp? |
18 |
CatId=318&name=AGP%20Video%20Cards |
19 |
> |
20 |
> The first thing I found in google, you can see there an nvidia geforce |
21 |
> 7600, it's agp. The 7xxx is the last series of nvidia with agp support, |
22 |
> though in some parts it's quite difficult to find one. |
23 |
|
24 |
Well, the nVidia might be nice, but I asked specifically for Radeon (tho |
25 |
other well freedomware driver supported or headed that way card would |
26 |
work) as well as AGP, because Radeon is AFAIK the best freedomware |
27 |
supported hardware available. |
28 |
|
29 |
But... (vv) |
30 |
|
31 |
> You can also see an ati radeon 2400 there, I own one however I can't say |
32 |
> I am really happy with it. But that's another story and I don't want to |
33 |
> spoil the thread more than it already is. |
34 |
|
35 |
hd2400, right? I'll have to take a look, now that I know it's |
36 |
available. That's r6xx I believe, and while freedomware support is still |
37 |
a bit rough, come about the end of the year or early next, it should be |
38 |
coming right into its own. |
39 |
|
40 |
Plus at least the PCI-E versions I saw were substantially cheaper than |
41 |
the $150 x1950 I was looking at. But while an r6xx chip, the x1950 is |
42 |
top of the r5xx line while the hd2400 is near the bottom of the r6xx |
43 |
line, so the x1950 may well be better performing. |
44 |
|
45 |
> My only point is there there are *lots* of agp cards that are more than |
46 |
> capable of doing desktop effects of any kind. The beryl/compiz stuff was |
47 |
> born much before pci-e was in our houses. :) |
48 |
|
49 |
Yes, but Intel is on-board-only, AFAIK, so out as far as an expansion |
50 |
card, nVidia freedomware drivers just aren't there yet and may never be |
51 |
without nVidia's cooperation at least on documentation (and they'd still |
52 |
be out for me, as they are NOT cooperating, and there's a reasonable |
53 |
alternative that is), Via has started to cooperate and got a big boost in |
54 |
freedomware points for hiring Herald Welte as their FLOSS community |
55 |
liason but is a good year behind AMD/ATI, Matrox seems to be out of the |
56 |
game now or at least it's been a very long time since I read about any |
57 |
new product... and the only one left is AMD/ATI with their Radeons. |
58 |
|
59 |
Now, on the Radeons, thru the r5xx chips (thus thru x1950 cards) are well |
60 |
supported now, and the r6xx and r7xx are getting there but will be |
61 |
another few months. But I (obviously mistakenly) thought the r5xx was as |
62 |
high as AGP went, so I thought the x1950 was the top of the line in terms |
63 |
of what I could upgrade to. |
64 |
|
65 |
It may still be that the x1950 is my top option, but I know there's r6xx |
66 |
AGP cards now, something I didn't know before, and so at least have |
67 |
another option, and it may be I now have equal performance at better than |
68 |
that $150 the x1950 seems to run, or better performance at about the same |
69 |
price. I have the extra option to research, now. |
70 |
|
71 |
-- |
72 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
73 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
74 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |