Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: SOLVED: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone?
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:10:38
Message-Id: 5bdc1c8b0609221708t53c0557bw30a746f548acffb5@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-amd64] Re: SOLVED: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone? by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On 9/22/06, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
2 > "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@×××××.com> posted
3 > 5bdc1c8b0609221235i2270bbenf016d5fa7a1998ec@××××××××××.com, excerpted
4 > below, on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:35:47 -0700:
5 >
6 > > It turns out that for me the problem was the ati-drivers package.
7 > > Switching to the radeon driver today lowered the CPU usage back to the 9%
8 > > range that I was used to:
9 >
10 > Thanks! Always nice to see freedomware win. =8^)
11 >
12
13 I agree Duncan.
14
15 Now, the one issue left for complete world domination would be to
16 better understand how to get DRI working with this video adapter. Am I
17 correct that DRI==3D? Or does DRI go further than just basic 3D and
18 help other things like MythTV or something else I'm not thinking of at
19 all?
20
21 I do see these messages in xorg.0.log:
22
23 (**) RADEON(0): RADEONSaveMode returns 0x709390
24 (WW) RADEON(0): Enabling DRM support
25
26 *** Direct rendering support is highly experimental for Radeon 9500
27 *** and newer cards. The 3d mesa driver is not provided in this tree.
28 *** A very experimental (and incomplete) version is available
29 from Mesa CVS.
30 *** Additional information can be found on http://r300.sourceforge.net
31 *** This message has been last modified on 2005-08-07.
32
33 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
34 drmOpenDevice: open result is 6, (OK)
35
36 I do NOT do ANY Linux-based 3D stuff today. My workload is Mainly
37 music applications - Ardour, etc., which do not care about 3D, web
38 browsing, MythTV and Xine to watch movies. Do I / should I care about
39 DRI?
40
41 I do occasionally play Windows games under Cedega. Would DRI ever help
42 that sort of application?
43
44 Anyway, things seem to be in pretty good shape. Maybe I should just
45 leave good enough alone. ;-)
46
47 Cheers,
48 Mark
49
50 P.S. - I'm still curious about trying your compiler flags but now
51 there is no pressing timeframe to do it in on this machine. - MWK
52 --
53 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list

Replies