1 |
It was a BIOS problem that was solved by a BIOS update. |
2 |
|
3 |
Sorry for bothering you, |
4 |
|
5 |
Nadav. |
6 |
|
7 |
N.B. |
8 |
|
9 |
A year ago I tried the NUMA option. The good news is that the computer worked fine, but of-course it's surplus. |
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
-----הודעה מקורית----- |
14 |
מאת: Volker Armin Hemmann [mailto:volkerarmin@××××××××××.com] |
15 |
נשלח: ה 07-מאי-09 02:08 |
16 |
אל: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o |
17 |
נושא: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: I can use only 3GB aout of install 6GB |
18 |
|
19 |
On Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009, Branko Badrljica wrote: |
20 |
> Duncan wrote: |
21 |
> > Then, look at memory model. Here, with current kernels, I have only one |
22 |
> > option, Sparse, evidently limited by my choice of hardware (Processor |
23 |
> > family and/or Supported processor vendor options, higher on the page, I'd |
24 |
> > guess or perhaps probed from the BIOS). However with older kernels, and |
25 |
> > presumably now if I were to choose hardware other than AMD Opteron/K8 (or |
26 |
> > choose a different BIOS option), there are Flat and Discontiguous options |
27 |
> > as well. Unfortunately, I can't tell you which options are correct for |
28 |
> > your (Intel) hardware. If you have multiple memory model choices, you |
29 |
> > may just have to try them and see. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> I thought those extra options were just for NUMA systems and were about |
32 |
> how the memory from several NUMA nodes "fits together" ie whether it has |
33 |
> to form one continuos memory range or not. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> |
36 |
> WRT to original question, I'd update BIOS and kernel to the latest |
37 |
> version available and if that fails to rectifyy the problem, I'd try to |
38 |
> toy with kernel memory option parameters |
39 |
|
40 |
well, duncan has some old hardware and likes to turn on a lot of superfluos |
41 |
options. Don't touch the numa stuff. Don't even enable it if you have 2cores |
42 |
or intel system. |