Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE4 problems
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:00:11
Message-Id: pan.2009.07.21.13.59.52@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] KDE4 problems by Mark Haney
1 "Mark Haney" <mhaney@××××××××××××.org> posted
2 4A65A339.6080109@××××××××××××.org, excerpted below, on Tue, 21 Jul 2009
3 07:15:05 -0400:
4
5 > Fernando Boaglio wrote:
6 >> Hi there,
7 >>
8 >> I'm a big fan of KDE, but since release 4.2.4 I 've been through some
9 >> issues ... and AFAIK is 64bit only:
10
11 Did you upgrade from 3.5 to 4.2.4 directly, or had you run earlier 4.x
12 versions as well? Were the earlier 4.x versions working?
13
14 FWIW, I've been trying to switch to the 4.x version since the 4.0 betas,
15 but without success until I got some extra time the last couple weeks and
16 decided now was the time to do it. I'm still having various issues, but
17 have overcome enough of them that I'm running 4.2.4 by default now, and
18 have unmerged most all of kde-3.5.10 but the base environment as I switch
19 to kde4 versions of kmail, etc.
20
21 Note that the rest of this comes across much more strongly negative than
22 I tend to be in general or about kde in general. Fighting for hours a
23 day, for days, to the point I'm only sleeping 3-4 hours most nights as
24 I'm up struggling with yet another problem, trying to fix or work around
25 issues in kde4 where kde3 "just worked", can do that to a guy. But I AM
26 gradually working thru them, often developing workarounds for what
27 remains broken, but other times finding fixes to apply. But honestly, if
28 I didn't believe in KDE, and didn't therefore have strong motivation to
29 stick with it, I'd not be bothering and thus wouldn't be so grumpy right
30 about now, so it's not all as negative as it seems.
31
32 But most of my issues are "power user" issues. Stuff like the fact that
33 I used khotkeys multi-key mode HEAVILY in 3.5, and global multikeys don't
34 work at all in 4.x and probably won't for some time, according to the
35 bug. Stuff like no replacement for the ksysguard kicker applet.
36 (ksysguard itself is still there, now called system monitor, but there's
37 no plasmoid containment to run it in, yet.)
38
39 But meanwhile, I've found the kde lists (kde, listed as kde-general on
40 gmane's list2news gateway, and kde-linux) reasonably helpful. You might
41 wish to come over and have a look around. =:^)
42
43 >> - Amarok is mute =(
44
45 I finally got fed-up with amarok, when the devs decided to require a
46 mysql client library that was wasn't designed for the way they were using
47 it, and that was broken on amd64. But that was simply the last straw, as
48 they'd already pulled most of the features out of the 4.x version that I
49 used amarok for, while leaving the features I didn't use much and didn't
50 care about, requiring all sorts of dependencies I didn't otherwise need
51 on my system, and developing even MORE such features and dependencies,
52 including, eventually, that mysql library thing.
53
54 So I switched to something else. As it happens, mpd, music player
55 daemon, with various clients (qmpdclient for kde4, at first kmp for kde3
56 tho I've unmerged it with the other "extra" kde3 stuff now, mpc for the
57 command line, and ncmpc and ncmpcpp for ncurses based interface, there's
58 also gtk and even web based clients tho I don't have those installed...)
59 was still WAY WAY less bloated than amarok, still has a music library
60 (tho I do mostly net/shoutcast streaming based listening), AND doesn't
61 shut down when I close X.
62
63 I still miss the kde3/amarok visualizations and winamp skin
64 compatibility, but those were some of the features that I mentioned above
65 that I actually used that were done away with for the kde4 version, so
66 it's not like I lost anything I wasn't already losing in amarok, and I
67 gained a lot, including console based playback and all sorts of client
68 flexibility, while losing all those bloated dependencies for features I
69 didn't use anyway.
70
71 But that's just me, based on what I used of it. If you use the music
72 scoring and advanced library management features of amarok, you'll
73 probably want to keep it, regardless of the bloat. YMMV, as they say,
74 but there ARE other alternatives if you're looking for something not
75 quite as "heavy", and without the issues keeping it working.
76
77 >> - devices are not mounting automatically =(
78 >>
79 >> I've tried some fixes I read on forums without any luck.
80 >>
81 >> So... how about you guys, same thing? =)
82 >>
83 >> BTW, I'm running now 4.3RC2 with the same problems =/
84
85 I got burnt out on pre-alpha quality kde4 being billed as release quality
86 some time ago, so I've stayed away from everything but full releases for
87 awhile... and it's STILL nowhere near kde3.5's quality, tho the trend is
88 good and it's MUCH better than it was. I'm not alone in predicting it
89 might actually get to something approaching 3.5 quality by 4.5, which,
90 given their six month minor release timing and the fact that 4.3 is
91 scheduled for just days from now, should be about a year...
92
93 But I'm still getting tempted to try 4.3 rcs, now that I've worked around
94 enough of the issues remaining in 4.2.4 to actually start using it as my
95 default desktop.
96
97 > My Amarok works just fine, I use it all the time for radio and podcasts
98 > without trouble.
99
100 Yeah, now that all the distributions finished running around like
101 chickens with their heads cut off trying to fix the broken on amd64
102 libraries that the amarok devs decided to use... without considering the
103 effect on their amd64 users or the various distributions trying to
104 support them.
105
106 But regardless, it's no longer a problem I need to deal with, now. My
107 current solution "just works". YMMV.
108
109 > As for mounting devices automatically I don't do that anymore, I had
110 > issues with devices automounting, but being boinced from mount point to
111 > mount point (ie /dev/sda1 to /dev/sdb1 to /dev/sdc1) even if I left the
112 > device connected. So I manually mount everything now.
113
114 Same here, for the most part. I tend to distrust "automagic" stuff like
115 automount, due to the various issues I've had with that sort of stuff and
116 a certain proprietary platform that does all that automagic including
117 autorun, by default, with the resulting malware including such things as
118 Sony branded rootkits, etc.
119
120 If I want it mounted, I mount it. If I want it unmounted, I unmount it.
121 Don't complicate my life by breaking what's perfectly functional as it
122 is, and I'll be happy.
123
124 (Still, I said "for the most part", as I do occasionally take advantage
125 of hal notification and automount for thumb drives and the like, despite
126 my misgivings, when it works. I just don't expect it to always work, and
127 have already had problems with for instance k3b, due to hal wanting to
128 mount a just-burned disk one place, while /etc/fstab says it should be
129 mounted elsewhere, and various bits of k3b getting mixed up when they
130 look one place and it's at the other, or not mounted at all due to hal
131 not obeying the plain as day configuration in fstab, when k3b is /trying/
132 to verify the image it just burned. If hal would just stay out of the
133 way and let fstab and k3b or manual mounting handle it, my live wouldn't
134 have had to be complicated by that bug!)
135
136 --
137 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
138 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
139 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE4 problems Fernando Boaglio <boaglio@×××××.com>