| 1 |
On Montag, 7. April 2008, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 |
> "Julien Cassette" <hazynrg@×××××.com> posted |
| 3 |
> 5c4f3a5c0804061351o7ab513d3u3934e26bf11104b8@××××××××××.com, excerpted |
| 4 |
> below, on Sun, 06 Apr 2008 22:51:47 +0200: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> [reordered this part first] |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> > Regards.Hi,<br>I see many lines similar to these ones in my |
| 9 |
> > netstat:<br><br>tcp |
| 10 |
> > 0 0 |
| 11 |
> > localhost:9050 |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Please kill the crap HTML. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
calm down! |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Julien sent a multipart message! Plain text AND html. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
If your mail client can not display the text part, get a new one, its broken! |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
For the record, kmail displayed it fine. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> /That/ is a security issue, and folks aware |
| 24 |
> of it won't be using a (local at least) client that parses it let alone |
| 25 |
> spits it out, for that reason. The raw HTML then looks like crap, as the |
| 26 |
> above should demonstrate. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
your rant looks like crap. Completly not asked for. Impolite and non-fitting. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Really, gmail or not, one would expect that someone interested enough in |
| 32 |
> security to be running tor would know not to post that HTML crap (altho I |
| 33 |
> guess it's easy to have it reset to html, as it's not uncommon even for |
| 34 |
> folks that know not to post html). |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
And I would expect someone who likes to bore everybody with his extremly long |
| 37 |
posts to look at the mail BEFORE starting lecturing. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Btw, netiquette demands that you sent 'corrections' like yours privately. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
gentoo-amd64@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives