1 |
On 12/2/05, Billy Holmes <billy@××××××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> Mark Knecht wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > installed so it seems to be an AMD64 issue. Note that the AMD64 box |
5 |
> > uses firefox-bin while the 32-bit machine uses Firefox from source. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> that is why :) |
8 |
> |
9 |
> your amd64 is running a 32-bit firefox, and you installed a 64-bit java. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> install the firefox from source and you'll have a 64-bit firefox, but |
12 |
> beware.. you won't get flash to work. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> that's why I created a 32-bit chroot. amd64 just seems to work better |
15 |
> with it. I'm not sure how you could install a 32-bit java in the 64-bit |
16 |
> environment with out a 32-bit chroot. Maybe you could slot it? you'd |
17 |
> still have to build your own ebuild for it, maybe change your profile? |
18 |
> Give a different CHOST or CFLAG for that ebuild so it would build the |
19 |
> 32-bit version? |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Sounds way more of a headache as compared to just installing a 32-bit |
22 |
> chroot. |
23 |
> -- |
24 |
> gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
Billy, |
28 |
Thanks. That helped. I actually use firefox-bin most of the time, |
29 |
but I also have firefox on the system. Running firefox instead of |
30 |
firefox-bin works fine on the site I was having trouble with. |
31 |
|
32 |
I'm not sure I'm up for creating completely separate, chrooted |
33 |
environments. I barely understand the one I'm using without creatign |
34 |
two! I think I'm run both version of Firefox for a while and see it I |
35 |
can limp along this way for now. |
36 |
|
37 |
Thanks for helping me see it work! |
38 |
|
39 |
Cheers, |
40 |
Mark |
41 |
|
42 |
Cheers, |
43 |
Mark |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |