Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: emerge -s world faild with xdvik and timidity++

[Dieter Ries]

Am Samstag 02 September 2006 16:35 schrieb Duncan:
> Dieter Ries <clip2@×××.de> posted 200609021328.03182.clip2@×××.de,
>
> excerpted below, on  Sat, 02 Sep 2006 13:28:00 +0200:
> > two of 600 ebuilds of my --emptytree world with gcc 4.1.1 failed, xdvik
> > and timidity++. here is the output :
>
> Interesting.  xdvik I don't have merged, but I do timidity.  I checked how
> long ago I merged it and it appeared to have been with gcc-4.0.2, back in
> January, so I remerged and it went just fine with gcc-4.1.1.

a friend of mine tried it on his opteron server, and he got the same errors, 
so if some people on this list could try a emerge -avD xdvik, we could make a 
bug report with many testers. 

timidity and xdvik both worked with the ~amd64 flag, 

>
> However, it looks like you were using 2.13.2 while I have 2.13.2-r2 merged
> here (since January).  I see this entry in the changelog:
>
>   26 Jun 2005; Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o>
>   +files/timidity++-2.13.2-gcc4.patch, timidity++-2.13.2-r2.ebuild:
>   GCC4 patch, thanks to <sunmoon1997@×××××.com> for the patch; bug #89933
>
> Thus, it would appear you need -r2 to compile with gcc4.
>
> $earch timidity++
> timidity++-2.13.2[0]: amd64 arm hppa ppc sparc x86
> timidity++-2.13.2-r2[0]: ~amd64 ~arm ~ppc ppc64 ~sparc ~x86
>
> So... -r2 is still keyworded unstable.  With gcc-4.1.1 now stable, that's
> a bug.  A quick look to see if it's already filed reveals:
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145669
>
> If you are running a mostly stable amd64 system, try adding this specific
> version to package.keywords as ~amd64.  If it then merges fine, test it
> and be sure it works, then add amd64@g.o to the CC list for the bug
> above, and add a note saying you've confirmed that it does indeed merge
> and work on amd64 stable.  That should get it stabilized fairly fast,
> unless Gentoo sound team itself has issues with it going stable, and I
> don't see any listed and it's already stable for ppc64.
>
> It seems fine on ~amd64 here, but that's of course not the same as saying
> it's fine on stable, so your specific statement to that effect would be
> helpful.  Don't forget to add your emerge --info too, so they know what
> USE flags you use.
>
> --
> Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
> and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

-- 
Frank Castle is dead!
Call me 'The PUNISHER'!