From: | Barry Schwartz <chemoelectric@×××××××××××××.org> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-amd64@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] Please get me straight about sysvinit vs. systemd, udev vs eudev vs mdev, virtuals and other things... | ||
Date: | Mon, 03 Mar 2014 18:58:03 | ||
Message-Id: | 20140303185750.GA11515@crud | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] Please get me straight about sysvinit vs. systemd, udev vs eudev vs mdev, virtuals and other things... by "Canek Peláez Valdés" |
1 | Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> skribis: |
2 | > Of course every single user can keep a neat and clean /dev directory. |
3 | > The point is, most users don't want to do that. Using udev solves that |
4 | > issue *for every possible user using every possible hardware |
5 | > combination*. |
6 | |
7 | Which is why it is a nice _option_, unnecessary for Gentoo in general, |
8 | and foolish to make a _prerequisite_ to run a whole lot of |
9 | software. That’s exactly my point, and I think it was Frank’s as well. |
10 | |
11 | The trouble comes not from udev itself but from ‘vertical integration’ |
12 | involving udev, which is directly contrary to principles of good, |
13 | modular design. |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Please get me straight about sysvinit vs. systemd, udev vs eudev vs mdev, virtuals and other things... | "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com> |