Archives
Archives
| From: | Lorenzo Milesi <lorenzo.milesi@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-amd64@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice.org natively available for AMD64 | ||
| Date: | Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:05:56 | ||
| Message-Id: | 29c147bd0610160603g34a34cd7q3a7a9e0731eb9130@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice.org natively available for AMD64 by Simon Stelling |
||
| 1 | > It finally happened: openoffice is expected to compile and work natively |
| 2 | > on amd64. In fact, I have just removed the package.mask entry. |
| 3 | > Versions starting from 2.0.4 should work and are therefore marked |
| 4 | > testing on amd64 (i.e. there still might be problems - please file bugs |
| 5 | > if you find any). That also means that you no longer need to run a |
| 6 | > multilib profile just because you need openoffice. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I had seen it this morning, and I though "What?!" :) |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Which are the real advantages in compiling OOo instead of using -bin? |
| 11 | Except the multilib thing? |
| 12 | I've heard of aging compilation times... :) |
| 13 | |
| 14 | thanks |
| 15 | maxxer |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice.org natively available for AMD64 | "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." <bss03@××××××××××.net> |
| Re: [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice.org natively available for AMD64 | "Michael Weyershäuser" <thedude0001@×××.de> |
| Re: [gentoo-amd64] OpenOffice.org natively available for AMD64 | Christoph Mende <ch.mende@××××××××××.com> |