Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Barry Schwartz <chemoelectric@×××××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Did devs change phonon flags without rev'ing package?
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:06:29
Message-Id: 20150330230617.GB26091@crud
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Did devs change phonon flags without rev'ing package? by Mark Knecht
1 Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> skribis:
2 > In my case I've been slowly converting my machine back to nearly
3 > 100% stable. I don't need anything more than that in my daily work
4 > these days and would greatly prefer fewer updates. In the old days
5 > when I ran a lot of Gentoo pro-audio overlay stuff I stay to stay
6 > leading edge all the time but these days I don't do that and life
7 > should be easier.
8
9 A few years ago I proved it is possible to go from ~amd64 to amd64 but
10 often I bump something to ~amd64 to overcome problems.
11
12 (For instance it turned out libav was being pulled in because the
13 ~amd64 version of ffmpeg I had allowed was no longer in portage. I had
14 to bump the version.)
15
16 > I was thinking back about my 32-bit usage when I built the machine.
17 > In those days (and it's likely still true) to run Windows VST plugins
18 > you had to have 32-bit support. I was doing a lot of software synth
19 > stuff a decade ago and suspect that was my main need in that area. I
20 > don't intentionally use 32-bit for anything so likely I don't need it
21 > at all as per Frank's comment but I also didn't feel like I really
22 > wanted to deal with that right now.
23
24 The processor is made to handle 32-bit so better to have it than not,
25 from my point of view. (The whole multilib thing might have gone
26 smoothly years ago, and with nomultilib a trivial difference, if we
27 merely had had the sense to stick with Gentoo’s original filesystem
28 layout for libraries. But this is my view in retrospect. We sometimes
29 pay a big price for following the leads of other distros.)