1 |
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Frank Peters <frank.peters@×××××××.net> wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:04:00 +0200 |
3 |
> Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> nossp seems to disable ssp on general. Still not |
7 |
>> a good idea. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I appreciate your concern but, all too often it seems, the notion |
11 |
> of "not a good idea" becomes "not a good idea therefore it should |
12 |
> be irrevocably disabled for everyone whether they want it or not." |
13 |
> |
14 |
|
15 |
Usually use flags that are discouraged are intended mainly to solve |
16 |
limitations in how we express dependencies/etc. It isn't that we |
17 |
don't want users to use them, but more that in the future we might |
18 |
change how they work and they could go away, causing trouble for those |
19 |
who depend on them. Think of them as unintentionally-exposed private |
20 |
interfaces. |
21 |
|
22 |
If there is something you want to do and there isn't a supported way |
23 |
to do it, feel free to discuss/ suggest/ beg/ etc. |
24 |
|
25 |
But, if you're told that doing something in a particular way isn't a |
26 |
good idea, be sure you understand why before you do it anyway. :) |
27 |
|
28 |
Rich |