From: | "Hemmann | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-amd64@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Best Desktop Patchset for kernel | ||
Date: | Wed, 05 Oct 2005 17:29:03 | ||
Message-Id: | 200510051926.49092.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-amd64] Re: Best Desktop Patchset for kernel by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> |
1 | Hi, |
2 | |
3 | ok, coaranm aside - have you EVER seen a dev recommending love- or |
4 | nitro-sources? |
5 | |
6 | I have not! Never! Never ever! |
7 | |
8 | There seems to be a reason that a) no dev has recommended them so far and b) |
9 | they are not in portage. |
10 | |
11 | And puulease.. nitro is nothing more than |
12 | ck+bootsplash+someotherunneededstuff. |
13 | |
14 | If you want the 'latency enhancement' of nitro, go directly to ck - Con |
15 | Kolivas knows what he does. |
16 | -- |
17 | gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: Best Desktop Patchset for kernel | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Best Desktop Patchset for kernel | Olivier Crete <tester@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Best Desktop Patchset for kernel | Jared Lindsay <cinder.sub@×××××.com> |