| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Richard Fish wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 10/4/06, Vladimir G. Ivanovic <vgivanovic@×××××××.net> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> About, oh, 99.9% of the world's email users wouldn't have any idea |
| 7 |
>> of what we're talking about. The notion that emails with different |
| 8 |
>> subjects would be part of the same thread would strike them as, |
| 9 |
>> expressing it politely, interesting. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Wow! I had no idea 99.9% of the world's email users were now using |
| 12 |
> gmail! :-P |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Well, if you include hotmail (which doesn't do threading of any kind) |
| 16 |
you might be getting close. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
On the other hand, if you surveyed the people who actually read this |
| 19 |
list, my guess is that the majority are using software that pays |
| 20 |
attention to the references header. I typically use thunderbird, and it |
| 21 |
does, and as a result this thread appeared hijacked. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I wish I could keep it from merging identical subjects into the same |
| 24 |
thread. On rare occasion I get emails with no subject from family and |
| 25 |
they end up buried in my inbox under another email with a similarly |
| 26 |
useless subject line... |
| 27 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) |
| 29 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
iD8DBQFFJlqRG4/rWKZmVWkRAvNRAJ9j/8Fjl/jfb2wVvqJqey3OqY7riwCePX5m |
| 32 |
ICPWItXdcNgcNyw18ykeNag= |
| 33 |
=O0yU |
| 34 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives