Archives
Archives
| From: | "Vladimir G. Ivanovic" <vgivanovic@×××××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-amd64@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: 2.6.18 kernel | ||
| Date: | Fri, 03 Nov 2006 04:36:08 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1162528390.11883.2.camel@scarlatti.leonora.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: 2.6.18 kernel by Barry.SCHWARTZ@chemoelectric.org | ||
| 1 | On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 10:51 -0600, Barry.SCHWARTZ@×××××××××××××.org |
| 2 | wrote: |
| 3 | > I’ve found vanilla kernels to be much more reliable on my system than |
| 4 | > Gentoo kernels (why I don’t know), |
| 5 | |
| 6 | FYI: I have never had a problem with gentoo kernels. I have had |
| 7 | non-standard modules that would not compile, but updating the modules |
| 8 | fixed those problems. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | --- Vladimir |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Vladimir G. Ivanovic <vgivanovic@×××××××.net> |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |