| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I've been a Thunderbird user for quite a long time, and I don't plan to |
| 5 |
change. I know that doesn't really answer your question, but I would |
| 6 |
just like to note that it is still the best mail client I have ever |
| 7 |
used. I cannot find a better, more stable, more feature-filled MUA with |
| 8 |
the small dependency list that Thunderbird has. Personally, I will |
| 9 |
stick with it even counting the discontinued support on Mozilla's behalf. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Dustin C. Hatch |
| 12 |
theNeverFading |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Mark Haney wrote: |
| 16 |
> Well, I'm sitting here reading about the lack of thunderbird devel over |
| 17 |
> the next year or two until the new Mozilla project (or whatever you wish |
| 18 |
> to call it) gets rolling and I'm wondering, what is a good replacement |
| 19 |
> for Tbird, specifically for KDE. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I use Evolution when I'm in GNOME at home, but I've really disliked it's |
| 22 |
> direction recently. KMail works off and on, but might be suitable. But |
| 23 |
> are there any others out there not built with gtk+ so I don't have to |
| 24 |
> compile all that just for one app? |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) |
| 28 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iD8DBQFHPxxCvxVzIQHsJokRAhGmAJ9iqZKhkxjA/qKe/PyCR9otSf0GVgCfaf4Q |
| 31 |
Ec35dxbR0q8zOfHewitNZF8= |
| 32 |
=ow+3 |
| 33 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives