| 1 |
On Monday 19 September 2005 18:24, P.V.Anthony wrote: |
| 2 |
> Thanks to both of your advice. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Yes it is true that I want to mount the remote server as local to |
| 5 |
> mount/edit the videos store on it. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> From your reply, I understand that NFS is the fastest. Any advice on the |
| 8 |
> resource fork files that are with Mac files? Will the resource files get |
| 9 |
> transfered across? Does NFS see the resource files? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
No, NFS does not see forks, unless the client on the mac makes a translation |
| 12 |
of forks to NFS. In any case to use your amd64 based videoserver you must use |
| 13 |
a linux based video processing application either (at least for the server |
| 14 |
part). It doesn't make much sense to use such a beefy machine only for |
| 15 |
storing datafiles does it? Even if there are native mac clients, your |
| 16 |
applications will not be able to use resource forks to work with a linux |
| 17 |
server. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Paul |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 23 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 24 |
Mail: pauldv@g.o |
| 25 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives