| 1 |
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Frank Peters <frank.peters@×××××××.net> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Once again, my decision to avoid the (to me) unnecessary complications |
| 3 |
> of UDEV has got me into trouble. It seems that developers just assume |
| 4 |
> that everyone uses UDEV and they will, inadvertently or otherwise, overlook |
| 5 |
> those few who choose not to do so. I just wonder how long I'll be able |
| 6 |
> to exercise this choice. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
It really isn't any different than running any other exotic |
| 9 |
configuration, like prefix, freebsd, or whatever (though those are |
| 10 |
treated as archs and get testing before being stabilized). Developers |
| 11 |
don't test under every possible configuration, so the more unusual |
| 12 |
your configuration is, the more likely you are to run into these sorts |
| 13 |
of issues. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
The only thing you can do is report bugs when they happen, or become a |
| 16 |
developer and help fix them. That's how every other arch gets |
| 17 |
supported - there are just more people doing it. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Rich |
Archives