| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Bernhard Auzinger wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Yes you are completely right, but that is not the point I wanted to make. I |
| 7 |
> just think avoiding any unnecessary disk access is the best solution as long |
| 8 |
> there will be the bottleneck. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Agreed - spending more money on RAM/CPU/disk/etc will often improve |
| 12 |
performance more than better-using the resources already available, but |
| 13 |
at some point you decide to stop spending money and at that point you |
| 14 |
have to work with what you already have... :) |
| 15 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 16 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) |
| 17 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
iD8DBQFGs5SlG4/rWKZmVWkRAqcvAKCMXqZYdPCjuQuMoVWausYS0AV5/QCfWpGY |
| 20 |
UnLBMLnSAlsz/4Id92TLZek= |
| 21 |
=hG8y |
| 22 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives