1 |
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
>> Looking for some thoughtful ideas from those more experienced in this area. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Please do share your findings. I suspect my own RAID+LVM+EXT3/4 |
6 |
> system is not optimized - especially with LVM I have no idea how |
7 |
> blocks in ext3/4 end up mapping to stripes and physical blocks. Oh, |
8 |
> and this is on 4k disks. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Honestly, this is one of the reasons I REALLY want to move to btrfs |
11 |
> when it fully supports raid5. Right now the various layers don't talk |
12 |
> to each other and that means a lot of micro-management if you don't |
13 |
> want a lot of read-write-read cycles (to say nothing of what you can |
14 |
> buy with a filesystem that can aim to overwrite entire stripes at a |
15 |
> time). |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Rich |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
I'll share everything I find, true or false, and maybe as a group we |
21 |
can figure out what's right. |
22 |
|
23 |
In the meantime, please be careful with your RAID5 and do good backups |
24 |
:-) I ran RAID5 for awhile but moved to RAID6 due to the number of |
25 |
reports I read where one drive went bad on a RAID5 and then the RAID |
26 |
lost a second drive before the original bad drive was replaced and |
27 |
everything was gone. |
28 |
|
29 |
Cheers, |
30 |
Mark |